So one of the arguments in favor of Atheism is that Atheism is the default of the mind. If atheists are the default, then that means atheism is primitive. Religion and those that gravitate towards it would indeed be smarter because it is evolutionary novel, not evolutionary normal.

Given books and literary rates would not have been very high in its time frame, those that were able to read religious scrolls would have been of a higher intelligence. Granted, by today’s standards, the Bible is written at a 7th grade level, so it’s not a high of a standard to set for more intelligent people, but given that the average US adult is barely at a great literacy level, just being at to read the bible is still too high of a burden for most. Source

If we also factor in that most arguments against the Bible are based on informal hearsay, not actual biblical text, the literacy rate of the average atheist is just as bad as a person of low literacy rates in a religious context.

Let’s look at one argument that permeates the atheist preview and that is how incest-y the Bible is. If one had bothered to actually read the text, they would have noted two things. 1. Incest is considered sexual immorality. 2. Two of the parables, which are noted in the Bible as parables, deals with the negative consequences of what would happen if one engaged with such negligence. A lot of atheists depend on informality to make such erroneous, non sensical claims, so the swamy narrative of the atheist movement is an insidious tactic, use to undermine peaceful people. That’s borderline narcissistic personality disorder as well, but so digress.

While not 100% true of all atheist, enough of them are leftists. If we look at the fact that using your government to take from others to give to others, that is one more tick on the evolutionary normal scale. Hard work would be evolutionary novel. Theft is primitive and less intelligent people engage in such.

Already we have two major factors that would see atheist as less intelligent than religious people. They’re two of the biggest elements, though. Are there less intelligent religious people? Of course, everything has its blind spots, but much like actual blindness, that too, comes in different levels. When a majority of people do even know Jerusalem is technically Africa, and all that separates it from that is an arbitrary line, can you really see Atheists are smarter than their religious counterparts?

As far as I am concerned, not knowing where Jerusalem is, borderlines antisemitism. Antisemitism is often associated with less intelligent beings.

When one looks at the facts, and I’ve barely even scratched the surface of primitive trains of thought that atheism delves into, I think one can conclude for themselves that Atheism is filled with less intelligent people.