Category Archives: Journalism

Twitter Dee and Twitter Dumb

Twitter has a real problem and no, I don’t mean the fact it is the only social media company that cannot make money.  I started an account for @Bestinyourgirl back in 2014 with the desire to build it up for promotional purposes.  By January 2016, I had just broken 400 in the early days of the account seen below:

10422176_10156521715470177_8855192212611536022_n

By the end of that same year, I had hit 600 on Twitter and it only seemed to be going up and up. My statistics were great, showing I knew what I was doing on Twitter, is was great for me, because I had no clue what I was actually doing, but still excelling.

14681818_10157526789330177_6953811081355953899_n
mid-late 2016, when I first broke 600 followers on Twitter.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I noticed though, that by the end of 2017, my followers really started taking a hit and everything I had worked to build on Twitter was going to hell, including the statistics that showcased I had merited an account, worthy of being in the middle tier of “successful” accounts. I was and am not a Twitter legend, but given that I had no clue what I was doing in 2014, I was very proud of what I accomplished in so little time.

Now, up until a couple days ago, my account stayed at about 380-ish, when my account started to balloon again, along with my tweets and statistics doing better again. It could be just interesting timing with the Tweets, but I suspect it isn’t. The weird thing is, all my new followers, baring a few, were ghost accounts. So I looked into this and found nothing. Here is the account as of Oct 10th 2018

newtiwtter

Back at 400, and growing, which is interesting. So, now I decided to go investigate how many accounts are real and here are the results:

twitteraudit

A majority of my 400 followers are real, except wait, that says 572, about the same amount I had by mid 2016, of 600, if you add in the fake ones, it is over 600. Also, Twitter says I only have 400. So the question becomes, why is Twitter removing and then allowing back these accounts, so that my count keeps going up and improving my Twitter stats again? Clearly Twitter should know the difference between fake accounts and real accounts, right? I’m not the only one being hit by this and this doesn’t seem to be discriminating between left or right leaning politics, it just hurting everyone who has taken the care to build their brand online, using these services and the sheer incompetence exhibited by Twitter, not just as entrepreneurs, but as service providers is staggering.

I for one do not think this is a result of Twitter attempting to get rid of fake accounts, something that doesn’t do much at all to boost most Twitter accounts. I think that was a way to save face and skit responsibility to avoid a lawsuit from brands being crippled by the system in favor of of lifting up verified or more followed accounts to attempt to make some money.

Has anyone else had this problem? How has it impacted you? Comment below!

 

Edit: Minor corrections to the text @ 9:52 pm October 10th 2018. Also, account is now at 401 and slowly growing still.

Amazon LOVES Pedophiles!

Amazon loves pedophiles, but hates men who buy books on dating. That’s right, the company that resisted pressure to ban a book by a pedophile on how to molest kids, has issues with men getting laid with adult woman.

-Click to continue>

How I Exposed Fake News

Click Here to read the press release

So I wrote for a fake company called The Kitchen LLC. It was promoted as a progressive restaurant, that would hire men only, just to cater to woman. Obviously this is satire and I was doing it as an experiment. It didn’t actually take much exchange and below you can see how easy it was, with so little vetting. Me-Sa Ginny is made to sound like misogyny and BachDish is a play on the German phrase, Buck Dish or Bend Over as it is translated! So obvious troll is obvious, right?

26730942_1970121836572709_2865615542324265538_n

It actually got printed on the front page of the Journal Tribune here in Biddeford, Maine.

It gets even better! Instead of redact with a small print block on page 4 as these types are apt to do, they fake an entire news article to save face.

jtlies

If you refer to picture, the last time they emailed me was 1/3 2018 and I did not reply back. You see the article still went to print!

So what’s a young man to do when he stumbles across a new organization that writes fictional news? He takes it to the media to expose it and this is what happens!

While I did get a few inquires, no one wanted to print it, except for one but due to a conflict of interest, the fact a parent company owns both, they could not. So I am bringing it here and showing the world how the Journal Tribune, a small time newspaper, fakes the news and why they do it!

As of now, they have deleted both and replaced the fake news with a small redaction in place of the fake news article, with them giving themselves too much credit for their “Due Diligence”, which, had they had such, it never would of gone to print in the first place and the only reason they knew is because I owned up, in an attempt to show the world the depravity of that brand!

26757169_1716979245032118_651442303847870272_o

Slight Edits and Correction to the text: January 15th, 2018

Fiverr.com is Horrible!

I started multiple gigs on Fiverr.com that are similar to things already allowed on the website. My third gig, was denied for copyright infringement because some third party claimed to own the act of reviewing.

mortal_kombat_logo-svg

Here is my e-mail on the gig.

Fiversucks2.jpg

This all happened after already having approved it in the first place. So I write to them this:

krspenwah

So they wrote back with

krspenwah

They marked it as resolved on the wrong gig, which is still active. If they meant reviews were not allowed on the site, then why is this here

krspenwah

 

The difference between my gig and this? I offered honest and objective reviews because these people’s clients deserve honesty. Instead, I guess, Fiverr’s policy is that fraudulent reviews are marketable and mine are not, even though an alleged third company complained.

If I were you, I would stay away from this company!