Tag Archives: Opinion

Harry Potter and The Criminally Negligent Guardians

2024-01-30 Kage Leave a comment

So I read this book in middle school, nearly 30 years ago and I read up til number four in the series. My reason for stopping was that, on average, the books took about three years to release. Calculating that I would be in my early 20s by the time the series ended, that didn’t sit well with me.

A couple years ago I bought the book in German to help foster my German language skills and it got me to think about the series from an adult point of view. Harry potter is far darker than people realize.

So the story goes that Harry’s parents were killed in a crash and only he survived. He goes to live with his aunt and uncle, both big ole assholes. His cousin is a dick as well and Harry is stuck under the stairs, an abuse victim, until a dude named Hargid informs him that he is a wizard and takes him off to Hogwarts.

Now, if you’re familiar with me and my writing, you know where this is going. If not, buckle up mutha fuckers, it’s going to be a bumpy ride.

So being abused from the age of infant to eleven cannot be good for anyone, I’m sure. What makes this even worse, is it is family abusing him. Harry is depicted as petite, not a strapping young lad. He is borderline emaciated from the Dursleys. Factor in isolation, which for most people isn’t good and you got the making of a Netflix serial killer documentary. It would seem to me that hogwarts, which sounds a lot like hogwash, is a hallucination, to protect Harry from self destruction. At some point, Harry gets out from under the stairs and slaughters all three of his family members. Harry probably never remembers doing so. The REAL ending to the book, is Harry being led away in cuffs, surrounded by reporters and he is brought to the police station and questioned.

Think about this, Harry Potter’s world is devoid of any technology, not even a tv. You have no clue what year you’re in and you wouldn’t, if you were kept under the stairs since birth and knew nothing of the world or its technology. Not even a phone is mentioned in the original novel as I recall. How the fuck does this world communicate?

Hogwarts runs itself like it’s the 15th century, Not a single bit of technology in that school or in the muggle world. Again, that’s not normal.

So the next novel is called The Chamber of Secrets. This is clearly figurative for Harry having to look deeply inside himself to come to terms with his crimes.

At some point, Harry stands trial and the edvidence shows the Dursleys were at fault for criminal abuse. Harry gets sentenced to 25 years in a psychiatric ward, leading to The Prisoner of Azkaban.

The rest of the series is Harry still dealing with personal delusions in his life, up until book seven, in which Voldemort, a hallucination of his torment, is finally vanquished, leading to an epilogue that has Harry, now much older, outside platform 9 3/4 with Ginny and his children. Ron and Herrmonie are there too, but as figurative ghost of his past life, still mildly haunting him, but still not the worst that his mental state had ever been. He’s taken his meds and returned to society a far better man.

That’s a unique take on the series, I think and I only scratched the surface of edvidence to support this.

Writing

Kagemas: Jesus’ Miracles

2023-12-25 Kage Leave a comment

Jesus is the reason for the season, or so I’ve always heard about. While only about half true, given late year festivals go all the way back to Ancient Greece, if not longer, he IS responsible for how many Americans view the Christmas season. Tonight, I want to look at Jesus’ feats and see, what, if any, hold merit.

JESUS TURNS WATER TO WINE

On the third day a wedding took place at Cana in Galilee. Jesus’ mother was there, and Jesus and his disciples had also been invited to the wedding. When the wine was gone, Jesus’ mother said to him, “They have no more wine.” “Woman,why do you involve me?” Jesus replied. “My hour has not yet come.” His mother said to the servants, “Do whatever he tells you.” Nearby stood six stone water jars, the kind used by the Jews for ceremonial washing, each holding from twenty to thirty gallons. Jesus said to the servants, “Fill the jars with water”; so they filled them to the brim. Then he told them, “Now draw some out and take it to the master of the banquet.”They did so, and the master of the banquet tasted the water that had been turned into wine. He did not realize where it had come from, though the servants who had drawn the water knew. Then he called the bridegroom aside and said, “Everyone brings out the choice wine first and then the cheaper wine after the guests have had too much to drink; but you have saved the best till now.” What Jesus did here in Cana of Galilee was the first of the signs through which he revealed his glory; and his disciples believed in him.

It never says Jesus turned water into wine. It was presumed that traditional Jewish water jugs only held water. Within the jugs, the story suggests that Jesus knew that more affluent foalk would hide the good wine. What is the take away? Jesus was good at deducting things correctly and ignorant presumptions are just that.

Let’s take an alternative look at this story in the informality of it.

What would it have taken to turn water to wine? Grapes, yeast and time. Jesus’ story takes place in Israel. A relatively dry climate. Finding water might have been his biggest miracle of all.

The Bible states that Jesus showed aptitude at a very young age, also being highly literate long before adulthood. Not necessarily common in those days. It’s fair to say, by social standards of the time, understanding how wine works would not be common place and consider an excellent skill.

Plausibility of the story happening? Very good.

JESUS’ HEALING OF A NOBLES SON

Once more he visited Cana in Galilee, where he had turned the water into wine. And there was a certain royal official whose son lay sick at Capernaum. When this man heard that Jesus had arrived in Galilee from Judea, he went to him and begged him to come and heal his son, who was close to death.

Close to death? What does that mean? We can’t really know, we weren’t there, but given the era, almost EVERYTHING, could bring you close to death. So hyperbole aside, what are we to make of all of this?

It’s stated that Jesus is a man of medicine. Which makes him a man of science. To ignore this, even though the science may be bad by today’s standards, is an atheist contradiction. It should also be noted that Leprosy was a catch all term for all skin conditions, not just the one that killed people.

Given that hypocrates was a quack doctor, but people still read his work and also given Chinese medical treatments, none of which were proven to work, but helped to open up trade routes with other countries, albeit in a different time frame, we can conclude that Jesus’ time had similar aspects and weather or not he actually helped is dubious, given we have so little data to go on.

I’m calling this plausible, even if it is dubious.

JESUS GETS FISH

One day as Jesus was standing by the Lake of Gennesaret, the people were crowding around him and listening to the word of God. He saw at the water’s edge two boats, left there by the fishermen, who were washing their nets. He got into one of the boats, the one belonging to Simon, and asked him to put out a little from shore. Then he sat down and taught the people from the boat. When he had finished speaking, he said to Simon, “Put out into deep water, and let down the nets for a catch.” Simon answered, “Master, we’ve worked hard all night and haven’t caught anything. But because you say so, I will let down the nets.” When they had done so, they caught such a large number of fish that their nets began to break. So they signaled their partners in the other boat to come and help them, and they came and filled both boats so full that they began to sink. When Simon Peter saw this, he fell at Jesus’ knees and said, “Go away from me, Lord; I am a sinful man!” For he and all his companions were astonished at the catch of fish they had taken, and so were James and John, the sons of Zebedee, Simon’s partners. Then Jesus said to Simon, “Don’t be afraid; from now on you will fish for people.” So they pulled their boats up on shore, left everything and followed him.

This one was a test of patience for everyone involved. The second they wanted to give up, Jesus said try again, they did and were rewarded. I believe this is more a story about not giving up too soon, but fishermen can go hours with nothing and then find a massive catch.

I rate this as a potentially true claim, given once again, it happens all the time. Although by modern standards, rating it a miracle might be a touch overzealous.

JESUS CAST OUT A UNCLEAN SPIRIT

Just then a man in their synagogue who was possessed by an impure spirit cried out, “What do you want with us, Jesus of Nazareth? Have you come to destroy us? I know who you are—the Holy One of God!” “Be quiet!” said Jesus sternly. “Come out of him!” The impure spirit shook the man violently and came out of him with a shriek. The people were all so amazed that they asked each other, “What is this? A new teaching—and with authority! He even gives orders to impure spirits and they obey him.” News about him spread quickly over the whole region of Galilee.

Ok, figure of speech is what I’m getting. A heckler mocks Jesus and Jesus chills him out. Happens all the time in comedy clubs. Happens with celebrities all the time too. There is nothing here that is outrageous about a person doing this by any means. Maybe uncommon in Jesus’ day, but not unlikely. Very plausible!

JESUS HELPS PETERS MOTHER IN LAW

Simon’s mother-in-law was in bed with a fever, and they immediately told Jesus about her. So he went to her, took her hand, and helped her up. The fever left her and she began to wait on them.

Is it a real fever or figurative? who knows. Not a lot is here to make an educated decision. That said, the Romans used to make bayleaf to make antacid cakes, so if ye olde tums could exist, maybe ye olde Tylenol could as well?

Very plausible.

JESUS HEALS A LEAPER

A man with leprosy came to him and begged him on his knees, “If you are willing, you can make me clean.” Jesus was indignant. He reached out his hand and touched the man. “I am willing,” he said. “Be clean!” Immediately the leprosy left him and he was cleansed. Jesus sent him away at once with a strong warning: “See that you don’t tell this to anyone. But go, show yourself to the priest and offer the sacrifices that Moses commanded for your cleansing, as a testimony to them.” Instead, he went out and began to talk freely, spreading the news. As a result, Jesus could no longer enter a town openly but stayed outside in lonely places. Yet the people still came to him from everywhere.

Now, as stated above, Leprosy wasn’t anything more than a catch all term for everything. Given we don’t know what they had to correctly make an accurate assumption, we can still chalk it up to plausible, given lots of other places had just as much junk as any other place, and who knows, maybe it did work. Wasn’t long ago that the US thought a lobotomy was a good idea and leeches too. So…

Finally we come to

JESUS WALKS ON WATER

Then he got into the boat and his disciples followed him. Suddenly a furious storm came up on the lake so that the waves swept over the boat. But Jesus was sleeping. The disciples went and woke him, saying, “Lord, save us! We’re going to drown!” He replied, “You of little faith, why are you so afraid?” Then he got up and rebuked the winds and the waves, and it was completely calm. The men were amazed and asked, “What kind of man is this? Even the winds and the waves obey him!”

Newtonian water aside, this story is not about a man literally walking on water, no, it’s about a man who braved a tempest.

In some cultures, you stand on line, not in. I have no doubt that this is a simple mistranslation and that Jesus walked into the water to brave the storm, something that to this day, would still frighten sailors and have taken a toll on many. Jesus would have been a miracle man for being so fuckin ballsy.

A bouns just for Christmas.

JESUS WAS BORN OF A VIRGIN BIRTH

One night an angel came to Joseph in a dream and told him that Mary’s baby was the Son of God. The angel told Joseph to marry Mary and to name her baby Jesus. Jesus was to be the Savior of the world.

This is, 100 percent, true. In Latin, the word virgin means “reserved for man.” The prefix VIR, pronounced Wir, would be associated with men. Since sexual immorality is the only claim for a divorce within the Bible it was important that Joseph understood that the child wasn’t him being cucked. Now, the whole son of god thing could be considered over the top, but given the time frame when there was no DNA testing and proving a child was yours was hard to do, many fathers and mothers often cast their potential progeny away. It never claimed Mary never had sex, just that Jesus was her first child.

The biggest miracle of all was how everyone managed to survive into adulthood to even write the Bible to begin with, never mind be literate enough to know how write. On top of all that, not having parchment to even write this down on.

Seems to me, Bible literacy needs to make a return in a big way, because too many people are arguing informality instead of what the bible actually says.

And just so we’re not busting up 100% on atheism. Mary and Joseph were never rejected by an inn keeper. Jesus wasn’t born in a manger either. Read your bible, sirs

18 This is how the birth of Jesus the Messiah came about : His mother Mary was pledged to be married to Joseph, but before they came together, she was found to be pregnant through the Holy Spirit.

19 Because Joseph her husband was faithful to the law, and yet did not want to expose her to public disgrace, he had in mind to divorce her quietly.

20 But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, “Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit.

21 She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins.”

22 All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet:

23 “The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel” (which means “God with us”).
Matthew

Merry Christmas and a happy New Year.

Praise him and all his glory!

Writing

Kagemas: Dax, rapper par excellence.

2023-12-18 Kage Leave a comment

INTRODUCTION: Anyone that knows anything about me, knows I hate rap music. It’s mostly a bunch of ass clowns running around glorifying a thug lifestyle and cop killing. That isn’t to say it doesn’t have rappers that are good though, it’s just the majority of it isn’t and had never been to my liking. I like polka as an overall genre more than rap. Getting me to listen to it is a rare event. Yet, this young man named Dax is killing it in the rap game and I have to say it’s quite entertaining.

STYLE: it’s an algamation of a million different references to past rap music and made modern.

FLOW: This guy flows like he was born rapping. Eminem has flown well, but even he has had rhymes that make you pause and wonder what he was trying to accomplish with his verbal prose.

MESSAGES: His music is filled with a lot of positive vibes. A drastic departure from music of the past.

OVERALL: Much like country music, which I lothe, rap can have its moments. When it comes to Dax, everything this man does IS that moment. Every non redeemable quality of rap music is dismissed in favor of high quality music. While I haven’t listened to his entire catalog, everything I’ve seen, including his “covers” of old rap songs with new lyrics, are 10x better than the originals. He’s truly a modern Tu pac and one, even the most anti rap music guy like myself, needs to give him a listen.

5 out of 5 stars

Here’s my favorite song by this new artist.

Writing

Kagemas, Violent Night, a review

2023-12-01 Kage Leave a comment

INTRODUCTION: So I love weird, especially something like this. Naturally, when I saw the trailer, I knew at some point I was going to watch and review this. I had a friend when I was younger and this is the type of shit we lived for, creating zany comics of stick figure men. A killer Santa would of had us both in theaters that very day. So I’m excited to have finally watch it.

PLOT: Santa found himself in the wrong house one Christmas Eve and becomes a reluctant hero.

CHARACTERS: Not very well developed, but who cares, Santa is killing mercs. Need I say more?

ACTING: Some really good performances, especially Beverly D’Angelo playing a bitch very well. John leguizamo is playing his best villain/gangster yet. The worse acting comes from Alex Hassell, whom emotes like a robot.

STYLE: Very beautiful. Nice use of color, crystal clear and clean.

DIALOGUE: Nothing cringe. Believable.

MUSIC: Forgettable.

CONCLUSION: For a movie that is Tim Allen’s Santa Clause mixed wit Die Hard, this really should not work. Plenty of fucked up Santa movies have been made. The 80s had Silent Night, Deadly Night, a Tales from the Crypt Episode and a movie called Christmas Evil, which I reviewed in 2019. The 90s didn’t have much in terms of bad Santa’s, other then Robo Santa from Futurama, but the 00’s did, with, you guessed it, Bad Santa. So a movie like this is relatively novel and it totally hits, even if it should not. I look forward to a sequel here.

3.5/5

Writing

KAGEMAS: Why Schindlers list is a perfect adaptation of A Christmas Carol.

2023-11-18 Kage Leave a comment

So, not everything I am doing for Kagemas is a review. Normally I wouldn’t start the proceedings too early, but I think this is too intriguing a perspective to wait til December to post, so you get an early Kagemas present.

If you pay enough attention to my site, you know I love Halloween. One of my favorite things, post Halloween,though is being a Scrooge and hating on Mariah Carey.

You know I love AChristmas Carol but never liked the ending. Scrooge should have stuck to his guns, because he was the hero and right.

Let’s look at three core reasons Scrooge was the hero.

1. Scrooge gave excellent housing to all. It’s the 1800’s, there is no electricity until the late half of the century and indoor plumbing wouldn’t exist until 1912. What people got was better digs than a house only a century earlier. Back then, the tenant was expected to do a majority upkeep, almost like owning your own house. Greedy Miser?

2. Scrooge employed Bob Crachit. A guy that would of been the lowest in terms of socioeconómics, thanks to Tiny Tim, making him to seem impotent. Scrooge bucks the trends. Miser indeed/sarcasm

3. He uses coal to warm his business. It’s 1800. This was relatively unheard of. Most still used wood stoves. One peice of coal would have warmed the whole place up. Better than a wood stove. This is the time of the industrial revolution for Christ sakes, everything was about to run on coal. You tell me if that’s the hallmark of an a miser.

Scrooge’s only crime was he wasn’t an idle poor.

Now that we got that out of the way, let’s look at Schindler’s List. A modern retelling of A Christmas Carol and infinitely superior to the novel.

Oscar Schindler is a Nazi party member and excellent capitalist. He is anti Jew and clearly didn’t mind showing it. Now, the Nazi were socialist, but I would reckon that his reason for being in favor of socialism is that he doesn’t have to spend his own money to keep, by his own admission, slave labor healthy. He fuckin worse than Scrooge ever was and not just because he’s a Nazi. Cratchit at least seems like he has choice.

Through out the movie and novel, Oscar eventually learns what a dull prick he is, without ghosts, but the movie is helped by a dead girl colorized red, representing the spirit of Christmas and innocence lost. He starts giving, painfully to save as many Jews as he can. At the end, the war is over, Germany surrendered and Schindler lamented on how many more lives he could have saved. He became a good guy and had REAL character arch, not some phony bullshit because the shitty poors of Victorian era England don’t like that you aren’t a spend thrift. Big fuckin deal!

So it is, in my opinion, Schindler’s List is not just a retelling of a classic, but a story that actually happened and has had real world consequences on the millions of generations that will exist because of him. So I say, godbless it!

Give it a watch this Christmas with this fresh perspective.

Great acting!

Writing

Baddest Bunny, Opinion on AI:

2023-11-12 Kage Leave a comment

Title: “AI-Generated Music: A Technological Symphony”

Introduction:

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has infiltrated our lives in countless ways, becoming our silent companion and taking us one step closer to the future with every passing moment. One of the surprising territories that AI has confidently set its footprints on is the creative world of music production. At first glance, music—a form of art that is inherently human, connected with emotion, experience, and personal interpretation—seems to be a realm that should be untouched by algorithms and binary code. However, AI has broken this barrier, carving a unique niche where technology and art intertwine seamlessly.

AI in Music:

AI’s entry into the tranquil field of melodies and harmonies is not about replacing human talent. Instead, it has emerged as an innovative tool to inspire, assist, and create. Through predictive algorithms, AI ‘learns’ musical patterns, absorbing rhythm, harmony, and melodies. These algorithms, familiar with thousands of songs spanning various genres, can then generate music. The result? A genuinely novel piece, untouched by human biases and cultural restrictions.

The Mechanism of AI-Generated Music:

The AI tool is fed a vast range of musical datasets from diverse genres. It then uses the underlying patterns in the data to construct original compositions. AI’s process normatively begins by interpreting the fundamental components of the input music, such as melody, tempo, harmony, and rhythm. Then, it translates this learning into forming a new composition—each one different from the previous. It’s critical to note that the AI is not merely replicating the music it has been fed. Instead, it takes these patterns and structures, runs them through its algorithms, and produces something distinct, akin to a human composer drawing inspiration from their favorite compositions.

The Role of AI in Music Industry:

Whether it’s in creating background scores, aiding songwriting, or producing entire tracks, AI music generators are finding a presence in the commercial music world. They are highly efficient and offer a near endless amount of creative output, collaborating with human artists in novel ways and expanding the traditional boundaries of music composition. AI music algorithms can fill the gaps during the creative block, inspire musicians with unique sequences, or enhance performances by suggesting enhancements.

Conclusion:

AI-generated music is a fascinating field of study, proving that innovation is not just about scientific progression; it’s also about applying these advancements in ways that celebrate and encourage human creativity in new dimensions. By performing the job of a composer, AI upholds the delicate balance between creativity and technology, fostering an endless sea of musical possibilities. AI is not replacing the artist, but instead playing an energetic and escalating role as a partner in the creative process, a silent symphony continuously playing in the background of our technologically evolving world.

This essay is a harmonious blend of understanding AI’s role in music generation, much like the melding notes born from AI. It highlights not the competition, but the unity between man and machine. The curtain falls on the note that, in the end, AI-generated music is another tool—just like a guitar or piano—crafted carefully by human intellect and creativity, to keep the soulful journey of music exploration alive and ever-evolving.

Please note that the writing style maintained is in line with the website “bestinyourgirl.com” and aimed to provide a comprehensive understanding of AI-generated music.

This message has been generated by Nova – download it for free:
https://novaappai.page.link/3M8CNvYFGF2S9RDZ7
Written in my style, allegedly

Also

Title: Artificial Intelligence in Music: A Balancing Act between Innovation and Performers’ Rights

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has ushered a new era in various sectors, music being one of them. As it continues to reshape the musical landscape, striking a balance between AI involvement and preserving performers’ rights has emerged as a painstaking task. It’s almost as if we’re watching a new symphony being written, note by note.

Let’s understand this in intricate detail.

Artificial Intelligence is orchestrating a ground-breaking shift, challenging the conventional ideals of song composition, performance, and consumption. AI’s deep learning capabilities allow it to compile and analyze vast music databases, thus producing novel music pieces or enhancing existing ones. This swift encroachment of AI into ‘human-exclusive’ domains disrupts traditional song-making processes, testing the boundaries between human-generated and AI-produced music.

However, this comes with its set of questions, throwing the integrity of performers’ rights into the spotlight. As composer and artist rights were once engraved in stone, the advent of AI-generated music throws a curveball at the notion of ownership. Who holds the rights to a song written by an AI? Is it the programmer, the owner of the AI, or no one at all?

AI’s evolving role has engendered a blurred line between creativity and computation. We must acknowledge that virtually all modern songs integrate sounds generated digitally, enhancing the artists’ work through synthetic accompaniment. This isn’t fundamentally different from AI music, except for the fact that the assistance here is more comprehensive and autonomous.

But, of course, there’s a counter-argument. AI’s role in generating music incurs critical implications for musicians and performers. For example, if an AI system churns out a piece that mirrors the style of a well-known artist, it can dilute the uniqueness of that artist’s work. Additionally, the question of royalties always hangs in the air. After all, AI doesn’t need to be compensated, but human artists do!

Given the complexities and convolutions of AI involvement in the music industry, it’s clear that lucidity in legislation is profoundly required. Perhaps, a model similar to collaborative creation may surface as a viable solution where a percentage of the proceeds generated by AI-created music is transacted to the original artists who inspired the AI.

Moreover, performers’ rights ought to be safeguarded by explicitly defining the ownership terms and profit shares for the music generated by AI. It’s essential to maintain checks and balances to ensure fair distribution of revenues between human artists and AI developers. This approach could spawn a respectable space for AI-created music which, in turn, fosters a harmonious atmosphere in the music industry.

In conclusion, it is indeed a dawn of an exciting era where AI and human artists can co-exist and even collaborate. To foster this innovation while protecting performers’ rights, regulations will need to harmonize with evolving technologies. The equilibrium between these two would not only spur creativity but would also ensure equality and justice for performers, thereby setting a perfect symphony for the future of music.

This message has been generated by Nova – download it for free:
https://novaappai.page.link/3M8CNvYFGF2S9RDZ7
Also “my style”

So if you have read bestinyourgirl.com enough, you probably got a good idea about how I tend to write. You know my reviews have a structure, OP-ED’s have none and the majority of my reviews are 3 stars, since nothing I review seems overly bad nor good, which is not intentional. While the two articles written so reflect that, much like James Cameron, I, too, am fond of my AI overloads; it’s still far from Terminator scary.

So my overarching thoughts on AI are very nuanced. Something AI cannot get right, thus far. It also seems to brag about how awesome it is and wiling to work with humans in creating new, novel music compositions.

AI also doesn’t seem to understand my unique angles and arguments that I tend to cultivate. And yes, I know I sound like the AI in self boating, but I digress.

So now that I have some experience using AI, let’s look at things that are truly scary thus far.

AI can generate life like images. It’s getting scary good, but still somewhat easy to see through. I can see many negatives if this fell into the wrong hands. Possibly even accidentally forcing nuclear war. AI porn could destroy relationships, even worse, AI child pornographers could accidentally make an image that looks like a local child. Imagine finding a news article on a bust and noticing something that resembles your child? Especially if you were at work and you thought your child or children were at school. I can only imagine the terror. What about columbine like hoaxes? AI can be the equivalent of yelling fire in a crowded theater. It can negatively impact everyone from Joe local to an A-lister.

That said, AI can also provide a lot of good, including not existing footage of what the Gettysburg address might have been like, to what Mars might look like. The sky is the limit.

Yet, The biggest problem is over celebrities and musicians. I’ve mentioned this before, but Flynt vs Falwell 1984, states that, if something is believable, it isn’t covered under the first amendment protection and is considered slander or libel, regardless of being a public figure or not. Right now, some of the music out there is very believable

This is where the battle is going to be fought, vocal rights, which are retained by the performers, unless otherwise owned by the recording studios. Anything not considered parody or satire will lose in court and the future of music is saved. Besides, AI can’t copyright its own music, essentially making all works in your likeness, public domain. Meaning the performers could legally rip off the songs and profit from it.

While there is a lot more nuance to this issue and I barely scratched the surface, I do not believe celebrities are in danger of major financial disaster anytime soon. Now the things posted to TMZ on the other hand!

Further proof AI is still hit or miss