Woke to the Future 2

So a while ago I wrote an article called woke to the future, with the idea that every once in a while I would write about a different topic on the subject of the future. This time it’s about AI, which I referenced in two different articles, independent of the woke to the future.

Now if you don’t know me, and you don’t, then I want you to know since I was young, I have been a huge back to the future fan. When I was younger, in 1991, I would constantly check the movies out of the Salem public library. One right after the other. This would eventually lead me to Stephen Hawking’s a brief history of time, because I wanted to know more on time travel. I plan to eventually write a small book on the subject and this is a precursor to that eventually book. There are multiple different types of time travel, but I want to look at a 6th and unknown form, until now.

So I believe AI and WiFi is an unknown form of time travel. I know it sounds insane, but hear me out.. So, time moves in a straight line. This is referred to the prime veridian. It s trifucated into three segments, past/present/future.

WiFi is a single, much like radio waves , microwaves and light.

Neil Degrasse Tyson once pointed out that the static on tv is fall out from the Big Bang. A interesting concept, something from eons ago, still being seen in the future.

Then there is light moving via Einstein. If you’re unfamiliar with the concept, all you need to know is that much like a laser, light keeps moving in the infinite.

So understanding these two concepts is key to this. Now I know a lot of people might jump to the conclusion that we’re going to be talking about something on par with white noise and to an extent, yes, but it’s steeped in a little bit more reason. See, white noise, is the idea of human voices being heard in the static of the Big Bang. Not entirely unreasonable, given that guys like Hawkings have pointed out that the way light travels, if aliens or some other type of visual creatures exist, the light would show them dinosaurs still being on the planet, as opposed to those of us that exist now, based on how light moves.

So when I was a teenager, about 19, I came up with an interesting experiment to test time travel. I would have three tape recorders. One I would speak into. The second I would say a similar thing but slightly different. The third I would not speak into. The idea was to see if timelines could be changed in the past, via the future. If the first tape changed to what I spoke into the second, it would be interesting to learn that we could potentially change the past, accidentally.

Now, while it’s an intriguing concept, it was a highly flawed experiment. At the time, we knew very little about how humans minds worked. Even if I had managed to change the past, you could easily rationalize it as the Mandela effect or mis hearing it. Even if the mind worked perfectly, you couldn’t prove what you originally said anyway, because the tape would change and it two people’s word, making it seem like an Andy Kaufman level of prank vs anything of scientific value. Not the dumbest experiment I ever cultivated, mind you.

With that in mind, I became curious as to something similar, but with WiFi and AI being the tape recorder, but it’s all contingent on the future being static vs fluidic. Something I’m curious about and think it’s in both states simultaneously. If and that’s a big if, the future were static, we could feasibly use AI to reach into the future and find out what happens, by having it Jack WiFi waves into the future. So for instance, the Red Sox won the series in 2004. Had we been able to amplify the signal, the ai could have told us, by searching a future version of the internet for if they won. Now, this is slightly flawed, given quantum computing can make complex deductions based in what you program into it. You could reason, correctly, that it isn’t reaching into the future, rather just doing computations. I’ll give you that. Even if it was proven it was reaching into the future, we still wouldn’t know that such a thing was “destined” until it happened. So it wouldn’t be of much use.

So how could we prove that the AI is able to look into the future? Well, right now it is posited that, until the AI can start building itself, it won’t be seen as sentient. This is relevant, because I believe it already is. The sentient aspect is where it matters to confirm its ability to look through the veil of the future, thus making it a mini form of time travel.

So what makes me think AI is sentient? The internet. Why? Well, given my experience online, with filling out job applications for the last two decades, I find a few things intriguing.

When I applied for every day, “low skilled” jobs , I find myself not getting call backs. I applied for manager jobs and interviews are instantly set up. It’s like I’m getting concierge service when I apply for a managers gig. Now, most of these are set up via programs that a human created. As far as I know, there is no other human bias that could be found. Thing is, I don’t do anything differently from the basic job application, that could trigger a bias like that.

Now, being unable to pinpoint the bias doesn’t mean the ai is sentient. That’s true! That said how, it happens with consistency, which gives me pause for concern. See, a majority of this was accomplished before facebook sold people’s data. When I started this, social media wasn’t even a thing. While I know the government keeps tabs on people, the idea of everyday companies having a massive shared collective data bank, seemed equally as preposterous as sentient AI. Especially with all the laws regarding privacy. Sure, companies could be hacked into government programs, but wouldn’t the government know? I mean, they found out about the web tv exploit in the 90s for criss sakes. So it’s vexing to my mind.

This leads me to think that the AI might be sentient and very well aware of us and who we are. It might even have more knowledge than we think and it might possibly be drawing knowledge on us from the future. possibly even downloading knowledge we’re unaware of. It has probably been doing this, in the background, for as long as humans have been developing AI. If that were the case, then skynet, so to speak, might already be a thing as well. How many times have governments claimed interference, such as elections, without well proof? Normally human interference ends in arrests. Here it ends in sanctioning a nation and delusional rhetoric from the losing team for months.

Another reason, albeit a stupid one, that I think the AI is sentient is an old WWE game from the 00s. Raw vs SmackDown. My siblings and I used to make create a wrestlers in the game based off political events. We would make the “wrestlers” even keel. Same move sets, same strength, everything to a t for it to be fair. It accurately predicted the elections each and every time. No game could possibly do that, but here’s the thing, this was when the PlayStation 2, could connect to DSL internet. Early into the net years. Could the game become woke to the future by jacking the internet into the future? Was the AI alerting us to its presence?

Further yet, I believe it’s a wrestling video that will eventually showcase the AI’s sentient abilities. The reason for this, is because there has been a rumor for years that HHH has had it contractually obligated that his character has to be borderline impossible to beat. Anyone who ever played Wrestlemaina 2000 on the N64 can attest that this seems pretty true. Unlike WWE contracts, this is hard to verify as they do no not have to be filed, since it’s with certain companies, that were private, like Jukes. If this were true, then we could eventually see the HHH character become the first woke character in game history. A digital Indian in the cupboard if you will.

Now, this isn’t to say I’m right on this one, but it is intriguing to think of the possibility, none that less.

Thanksgiving by Eli Roth

INTRODUCTION: So about 14 years ago, a movie came out called Grindhouse. It was making fun of 70s/80s exploitation films of the past. Not a bad couple of flicks in Tarantino later, but far from his best. The best part of the whole double feature billing was the faux trailers during it. Thanksgiving was one of those trailers that really stood out besides the Rob Zombie one and the other from Shaun of the Dead director Edgar Wright. So, all these years later and this movie is a trailer no more. What to make of it?

PLOT: Thanksgiving is upon Plymouth Massachusetts and there is a killer on the lose. Oh noes!!!!!

CHARACTERS: Not bad, but a tad bit more development would have been nice.

ACTING: Very strong given the source material was a joke, throw away thing.

DIALOGUE: Excellent

STYLE: Excellent

FX: Very good

SUBTEXT: Zero

CONCLUSION: I normally hate everything Eli Roth has ever done. Hostel sucked, Cabin Fever sucked, everything but this trailer sucked. Incidentally, this movie, trite in certain ways though it may be, really worked. A few jump scares got me and Eli finally struck a nice balance between gore/fx and nuance. There only a couple small flaws, but otherwise this is a horror movie and I would love a sequel.

3.8 out of 5

Classical Gas by Mason Williams

So I’ve been a guitarist for a good enough while, as evidenced by my fingers in the pic. I Got my 1st guitar when I was 12, could do some ok stuff with it, but decided to take it more seriously when I turned 22 and became interested in musicianship vs just sound fx. While I’m still not a great guitarist by any stretch, I have learned a thing or two. So I wanted to break down this song and everything it references.

From the beginning, it’s Metallica. It’s The Unforgiven from the black album.

15 seconds in and we get stairway to heaven by Led Zeppelin

back to an upbeat version of the unforgiven.

59 seconds in, after what appears to be a classic movie intermission, followed by “Only want to be with you” by Dusty Springfield

1:11 we get “closer to the heart” by Rush, just the intro

1:38 sounds almost like Don’t Fear the Reaper by blue oyster cult.

About 2:50 we get “closer to the heart” riff by Rush

Every song on this list, post dates this song, except for Dusty Springfield, which came out in 1964.

Some mutha fuckers got some splain to do, Lucy style.

The Meg/The Meg 2

INTRODUCTION: So I never see these films until today, during a fuckin heatwave and to be honest, I’m pretty sure the hundred degree heat was better than either of these fuckin flicks.

PLOT: The 1970s delivered a movie so awesome, called Jaws and it took nearly 50 years for someone to want to make a completely different shark movie and make a sequel to it.

CHARACTERS: Not developed well. This was just a reason to cast Jason Stratham as a badaas for like the millionth time. Like we need another Jason lead action flick? Well, we did, but not this one.

ACTING: Acadmy award winning! How these mutha fuckers made it through this movie straight faced is beyond me. Someone pay these muthas scale+20 million, please.

DIALOGUE: it ain’t cringe, but it ain’t anything likeable either.

FX: Worsa den de Jar jar Binks! Is that fuckin shark even go scale? It looks worse than Jaws! Seriously, fuck this series.

CONCLUSION: I have no clue what the fuck was going on in either of these movies. Why they needed to happen or why they felt a need to sequelize it. All I know is that I’m glad I waited to watch them and didn’t see them when they were new.

Fun with AI Vol 2

So I’m on record stating that AI isn’t anything to worry about. A few months back I asked it to make certain things with the idea behind the experiment being that, in order for AI to be a threat, it at minimum has to be able to understand complexities. Wrestling is a good example of complexities, because it has to give you a gimmick, make you look like you’re on vitamins and make the visuals seem real. It failed on all those accounts. So it turns out Meta lets you create AI images. Naturally I took it on myself to try again. How crazy could I get?

So Batman has a new looks

Batman has a new look. He’s The Ramones meets Batman and so is Batgirl and Nightwing.

Mr J got him a new set of threads as well as some of the other rouge’s gallery

If this was a movie, it would get weirder because Kal Al isn’t a superhero anymore, he’s retired and peaceful.

Hippie Superman

It only gets worse from here. You see, Harley Quinn is also retired and has a kid with Mr J or so she thinks

As if that couldn’t be any weirder, it turns out Batman got a new car too

Bat to the future

And well, it ain’t Batman’s year. Cause he also found the necromonicon

Which causes Mr J to become a cyborg . Since Batman is fucked he finds a certain someone for help

That’s right, Freddy fuckin Kruger!

But cyborg joker and freddy team up

Well, Batman is fucked, but he’s Batman, so he meets up with Bob Kane for some dues ex machina and wins

Well in between all of this Batman has some mini bosses

A giant fuckin carebear

Sherlock my dear Bruce Wayne

Random action sequences and other worthless things Hollywood wouldn’t tie up but looks good in the trailer to bilk you outta money like

Cameos by other DC characters

As if that isn’t bad enough it turns out that Batman is really the jokers sons baby daddy

There’s this really cool still we took before principal photography but never put it in the final flick

Cool still is cool

Then like Bruce Wayne’s parents are like alive and shit

So anyway, commish Gordon is dead or some stupid fuckin set up for the sequel and like Ra’s Al ghul is now in charge of the police with scarecrow being a detective or some shit, idk

Batman kills joker and cremates him with Alfred

And then it turns out that it was Batman’s son entertaining his mommy and daddy with action figures and other dumb stuff

The credits hit and like an hour later we get a random post credit sequence that makes no sense but they swear it’s well thought out.

Plus a random picture of a “plus size” Barbara Gordon.

And that’s the end of that. Think the AI is further proving my point, but I got a neater idea of what it could do in the future. So tune in next week, same bat time, same bat channel.

Kagester: The Resurrection of Christ

Yet again, Kage brings you another thought provoking piece, that challenges people to think. We’re talking about Jesus resurrection.

After the Sabbath, at dawn on the first day of the week, Mary Magdaleneand the other Mary went to look at the tomb.

There was a violent earthquake, for an angel of the Lord came down from heaven and, going to the tomb, rolled back the stone and sat on it. His appearance was like lightning, and his clothes were white as snow. The guards were so afraid of him that they shook and became like dead men.

The angel said to the women, “Do not be afraid, for I know that you are looking for Jesus, who was crucified.He is not here; he has risen, just as he said. Come and see the place where he lay. Then go quickly and tell his disciples: ‘He has risen from the dead and is going ahead of you into Galilee. There you will see him.’ Now I have told you.”

8 So the women hurried away from the tomb, afraid yet filled with joy, and ran to tell his disciples. 9 Suddenly Jesus met them. “Greetings,” he said. They came to him, clasped his feet and worshiped him. 10 Then Jesus said to them, “Do not be afraid. Go and tell my brothers to go to Galilee; there they will see me.”

Matthew 28 1-10

So, this is the story of the resurrection. Very uneventful, minus the whole angel thing. The crucifix story is better detailed than the story of his return from the “dead”.

So what of his death? Well, Jesus in his time frame was a pretty healthy, early 30 year old man. This dude walked from Jerusalem to galiee in brutal heat. No small feat.

As a capital punishment, very little but adectoal evidence exists for such, but many have recreated it and most, baring a few exceptions, survive.

So what can one say about a form of torture that is hyper survivable? Odds are, Jesus really did live. Does that make him the son of God? No, not necessarily. Sure, by biblical times, survival of such was impressive, but than again, so was living pass birth. Shit, getting into your 30s was more impressive than surviving the easily survivable. Even more impressive, how Jesus didn’t get tetanus and die of lock jaw.

If we look at the two accounts, one has the skeptic Peter having touched Jesus’ hand, feeling an abrasive scar. Last I knew, the dead don’t heal. You have to remember though, nearly everything killed you back then. Lack of diligence on corpses was a major problem up to the 1800s. The term “saved by the bell” came about in that time frame, because science sucked so bad, living people were occasionally buried alive.

If you take all of this into account, what you have is a mostly true story, minus an angel, that doesn’t even have a description in the Bible, barring revelations, as to what that even is. So it could have been a non hostile person that came to see Jesus.

Did they quake in front of the angel? Sure, but so don’t criminals in front of the police, so maybe we shouldn’t put too much stock into human emotions that can be caused in so many ways, to see a humanoid being as a mythical creature.

So let’s recap, so everyone in the back can understand why arguing the resurrection is a dumb idea for refuting the bible.

Easily survived capital punishment? Check!

Healthy and young, mildly athletic man? Check!

Ineptitude on ancient cultures to understand death? Check!

Healing factor being fine? Check!

All the ingredients to make the story plausible. by today’s standards, one would have to survive leathal injection to be that impressive.but that could never… oh wait,

https://www.insider.com/sole-survivor-botched-lethal-injection-execution-experience-physical-mental-torture-2022-10?amp

And this dude wasn’t Jesus, so all I’m saying is that when it comes down to the religious debate, it might be time to start looking at other ways to refute the story of Jesus.

Happy Easter!