Tag Archives: Psychology

Writing

Why it’s ok to think your partner is ugly.

Leave a comment

I know I’ll catch a bit of shit for this, but I have a valid reason for it.

You won’t always find your partner attractive and that’s normal and natural. It’s how you engage and act after thinking that, that really matters and here is why.

So, we’re evolutionary prone to stay away from things that hurt us. Disease, being one of the major things. You’re learned from Covid that quarantines sometimes work. We learned this in childhood when our parents had us stay in our bedrooms to prevent other family members from getting sick.

What’s one way our parents or friends noticed. “You don’t look so good” is normally what is said, or something similar to this.

So even though your partner isn’t Family by blood, unless you’re from Kentucky, they’re still a loved one. Especially when you have kids involved.

So it’s more than permissible to find your partner to be unattractive from time to time. Especially when they’re sick. It’s a natural trait of human empathy to want to see the sick in an unflattering light, ironic though it may be.

Think of the novel Lolita. Humbert makes poor Delores put out, even when she’s sick. A human being cares for their partner and puts them first. They’re more than just a vagina or dick.

Thinking your partner to be unattractive actually presents you in a flattering way, instead of narrasstic. however, like above, tactful presentation is key.

Think of the 2008 campaign trail where John McCain got shit on for leaving his first wife with cancer and rightfully so. That’s a rather poor way of going about it. I know it’s easy for me to say, given the whole I’ve been single for years, however being a serial monogamist gives you no more special knowledge than a dude that set out being a CAD.

However, much like your partner and you, this is not about one single individual, rather it’s about the idea behind being selfless in selfishness. Oxymoronically though it may be, there can be far less conceit in selfishness than selflessness.

I’ve pointed out before that a child between two people act as a blood bond, a sacrament and as such, makes your partner equal to family.

However, since you’re not genuinely blood, there isn’t the same need to stay with said partner in today’s day and age. However, you both develop independent needs to protect said child or children. That’s a selfish concept. You give your kids what you can, because it pleases you, the individual to give to them. Like with all things in life, context is key to understanding.

This brings me back to the topic at hand, which is to say that finding your partner unattractive may seem selfish in the sense people try to tie the word to anything negative, however, wouldn’t you be better off acknowledging that feeling instead of being insecure that it makes you seem negative? What’s more selfish in that regard?

I’m against morality as a concept, because I see it as childish. However, I do believe in right from wrong and that we have 4 biological imperatives. The 4th is the most no shit Sherlock thing ever, I almost never include it and leave it to the three major ones. Don’t rape, don’t steal, don’t kill and the 4th is don’t incest.

Finding your partner ugly doesn’t count as one of the major four, so it’s regaled to basic right from wrong. It’s never wrong to think things through. Bad thoughts are not tantamount to bad actions.

It’s good to have a fantasy outside of your partner for instance. Porn is good for giving you an ethical “cheat card” to think of someone that isn’t your partner as an option. cheating would be the worse option.

Thinking your partner unattractive is the same as the above.

Remember, sometimes love requires asymmetrical trains of thought. It’s not criminal to find your wife or girlfriend unattractive from time to time, it is however horrible to dump them for not living up to a bullshit standard you can’t even live up to 24 hours a day.

Stay metal 🤘

Writing

NPD and You, all you need to know over the years internet hussies.

Leave a comment

I told you I was working in a longer piece.

NPD, narcissistic personality disorder comes in a variety of flavors. However, your basic bitch version comes from the parable of Narrcisius, the Ancient Greek dude that loved his reflection so much, he drown in the river Styx. Never mind that Styx was supposed to be a shallow river, so he was stupid too. I digress, though.

So, ironically, NPD has to affect the narc the most in order for it to be a personality disorder. it’s an internal need that the narc has to placate in order to be whole that’s adjacent to normal drive. So for instance, you need to adult, pay your bills, ect. Friction that keeps you from achieving these goals can be stressful, however, it’s not NPD because life makes that a necessity. However, being famous for instance isn’t a need, thus it’s NPD.

Another instance, especially the in a looks driven Millennial world, and you can’t really blame them given most, including the celebrities are fuck ugly. However, if you’re trying to date exclusively to attractive men or woman and that causes you friction, then you’re NPD.

you’re lucky enough to be Channing Tatum good looking, and not dating attractive cause you friction, then you’re NPD.

In other words, it’s the ok to not fuck ugly people and doesn’t make you NPD for saying no.

Another Millennial NPD factor is their unnecessary need to fit in and buy the right clothes or other bullshit branded thing to be liked. That’s NPD because it’s causing you unnecessary friction in your life.

If someone doesn’t like you for you, that’s their loss and if the autism brigade like Boomers and Millennials hate you for it, that’s them being malignant narcissists. No one has a right to cause you problems over something as dumb as clothing or a cup of coffee. Shun those people, you’ll be better off.

A good exception to the rule of the above is summed up here. The 3rd Die Hard

John McClane with I hate N**ers. Of course people will be upset, come on, that’s common sense.

Obviously the above will piss people off. However, within the movie’s context, McClane would have been more NPD had he not done as such, because he would have had the deaths of people on his conscious.

Need to always give your opinion to people? You’re NPD. Random strangers do not have to value you or your opinion and that doesn’t make that person a narc for not valuing you one way or the other. Your reaction, in the negative to someone not having much thought you one way or the other does.

The Narc often lacks self reflection, thus it’s hard to change, because doing so would require a deep delve into themselves and looking bad isn’t in their psyche. No, they’re good people, it’s you who are wrong.

What millennials seem to do is what is historically referred to as “marking” a pro wrestling term that used to be used by con men. You would treat the mark in question how they were dressed and attempt to dupe them out of whatever you thought you could get. So going out in $1000 dollar Armani suit, they would expect to be ass kissed by everyone as if they were a celebrity. That’s NPD makes you a narc. Most normal people would treat you accordingly to actions and not clothing.

Words aren’t necessarily NPD, it’s dependent on the overall context of the event. Ted Budy took personal responsibility for his crimes when it was too late and said pornography made him do it. Hate to break it to you, but that’s still a narc thing, because had there been real remorse, he would’ve stopped at one and turned himself in.

Words oftten associated with NPD, as catch all to shortcut explanations, because reading and thinking is too difficult, make for a warm security blanket and a sumg sense of superiority, but none of it is accurate. Hey, those internet gurus with their worthless degrees have to make money somehow, so they throw stupid phrases that a person with NPD could have said, that are not really things related to narcs because they tend to be narcs themselves and need the attention from you worshipping them on the internet.

Quick aside, As a general rule, if the talking head on YouTube seems like a boomer or millennial, they’re probably NPD, ignore them.

Since only the narcissist knows they’re a narcissist for sure, most of these people giving you the advice have their heads up their ass to keep getting your engagement for money.

Like I’ve mentioned before, if you paid for this, you’d have a malpractice suit on your hand. That was mostly about the phonies online that exist just to cause friction.

Here’s a sure fire way to spot a narcissist. Intersectionality with you, in a harmful manner. We’re talking about actual harm, not made up bullshit. So let’s use an actual example of this from my personal life.

When I was 16, I lived in a certain area where I met a 18 year old man and a 25 year old man online and we played cards. A game known as WWF Raw Deal.

The 18 year old was the one we are focused on, because he’s the one in question that caused a ruckus for his need for attention.

Anyways, the 25 year old and I were only friends with him because we felt bad, because no one liked him. He was a textbook millennial. Thought his opinion always mattered, constantly having arguments with people over petty stuff. He, like most millennials, suck at being normal. The average millennial is NPD at minimum, and outright sociopaths in others. NPD would just be an improvement, over the later.

So the 25 year old and I thought we could help him and have him having a better life than he did and boy were we both wrong. Those two ended up breaking up with each other over the 25 year olds, uh, romantic interest let me say and how the 18 year old thought she was ugly. Not the underling fact she was 16 herself when they met.

Hell, knowing these two caused all three of us friction in our lives and was quite possibly one of the dumbest things I ever did in my life. They once had admin privileges on a site called Team Canada Online. A moderately decent Raw Deal/Pro Wrestling forum.

So this prick called AmericanNightmare76 had issues with the three of us spending time together. However it wasn’t because they were hanging out with a 16 year old, rather his own jealousy, since he literally IP banned the entire town over it. So they ended up losing their admin privileges over that and I was banned and then I signed up again to be a righteous prick, because what type of toxic cocksucker takes it out on a whole town?

Never mind the fact that when I moved to Biddeford in 2004, and the owner of the card shop asked how we knew each, the then 27 year old JOKINGLY , told him we met in a juvenile detention center and we fell in love. Of which the store owner of said place then was more interested in why I was in allegedly in juvenile detention, when I wasn’t , over the whole nearly 30 year old man saying he Child molestied me.

Honestly it’s for the best all three of us stopped spending time together as it always resulted in negative bullshit.

Now, in this story we’re talking about the 18 old. He had this friend and the friend in question eventually became a full time WWE wrestler. He was released years ago and it didn’t last long as a stint.However, this has never stopped that former 18 year old, now 41-42ish, from running his trap about it, and with mentioning my name in the context, because I’ve had people who don’t know me, ask if the story was true, years after the fact.

Oddly enough a person with NPD would have run their cocksuckers about how they knew that person before they were famous.

However, if you can’t prove it, it’s irrelevant. For instance a friend of mine I’ve known since 2007 from a MySpace chat has done substantial on a certain social media platform, however, I don’t tend to run my cock sucker about it. I’m proud of him and glad he’s my friend, but what exactly am I hoping to get from such by telling you? The answer is nothing.

Now, I know you’re curious to know, the answer to who the wrestler was in question and if I knew them, and the answer is I won’t tell you, but it might have be them.

I wasn’t friends with the future wrestler in question, I just played Raw Deal against them, potentially and took second place in that respective tournament in 2003. Only Comic Images, the 25 year old and the game shop know for sure. Either way, I didn’t like him then and not a fan now, so it’s a moot point.

However, the former friend in question, was having actual intersectionality with my life by people asking me things that aren’t their business anyways, so he could he get whatever perceived value a mid carder would have. Fuck if I know what that would be.

The reasons we’re former friends is because , of all things, I refused to help him get over in the Indy wrestling of this state. He knew I knew wrestling well and wanted to capitalize on that. He wanted to be my manager, since that’s what he trained in. however I never wanted to be a performer. I can’t stand acting or entertaining people in general, it’s a waste of my time, talents and years of education to be regaled to the back of the bus like Rosa Parks.

Also, the whole aforementioned bullshit of every time the three of us are together, bad shit happens.

However, he got pissed at me. Some of the back and forth between us still exists on the internet, however I’m not going to share it out of the fact it’s still no one’s business and I don’t need him getting attention more than he has. Thankfully he deleted himself from my facebook and I have not seen him since 2013. The 25 year old ended up marrying the 16 year old in her 20s and had kids with her.

I need to make the point though and that is this being textbook NPD. He was driven by his need for stature at the expense of his friends, he caused negative consequences in the lives of people like myself and the former 25 year old.

There’s also the opposite of gaslighting he uses, which is the implementation of false memories esoterica that the internet doesn’t give.

Like he claimed the wrestler in question and I had a match together. A match that he knows never took place, because he autisticly needed a road story to be like “the boys” in the back. I know so, because that’s how he pitched it to me back in 2013/2014 or so, when we were at the 7-11.

The fact he claims the wrestler and I went to school together, which never happened, given the age range between him and I, is a 6 year difference,so he would have graduated long before I was a freshman, for the record I entered into high school in September of 2000.

He knows I’ve been courted for pro wrestling multiple times in my life and I declined each time. I have never stepped foot in a ring. The closest to wrestling I’ve ever gotten was horsing around with friends in childhood. I am, however a fan of wrestling and have historically enjoyed watching it.

So with that out of the way, what’s NPD about it?

So on the DSM spectrum this would type as

  1. Need to associate with high profile people or institutions(Kage note, a wrestler being high profile in his mind. Lmfao!)
  2. Delusions of grandeur, like his constant attempts at working only in Hollywood and his failed attempts over and over again.
  3. Need for validation.

Those are 3 out of the 12 or so criteria. You only need 4 to be considered NPD by a professional. I’m not a professional, so I’m not diagnosing him, however I’m educated enough to spot the problem and have walked away from it.

That is real intersectionality with someone’s lives and multiple people’s to boot. Some narcissistic take faux intersectionality to a new level, just a person working the same job as them triggers them and they don’t want that person around. That’s not real intersectionality. It like saying you have an emotional support celebrity without that celebrity consent. It’s a falsehood and outright mental illness at that. Just existing isn’t a normal persons cause for concern. You have to be harming someone in reality, not just their perceived misgivings.

These are of the utmost importance in explaining now NPD really works. It not pointing out that people are overly sensitive, especially when they are, because most NPD people are overly sensitive themselves, so they’re just projecting themselves on you. Everything these videos tell you, are often just the narc projecting their bullshit onto you.

Now, When I started Bestinyourgirl.com, I had one rule that was the most important of them all, that was, unless necessary, all celebrities were persona non grata. Why? They’re worthless SEO, for one. Too many idiots abuse their names for that.

2nd, they completely irrelevant to a website that’s all about my writing. Some might say that makes me NPD. Does it? If I came into your place and put my feet up without permission or invitation to do so, am I not breaking and entering? Of corse I am, right? So naturally, we’re going to ignore them. Arrogance? Maybe, but what has a single celebrity done of any value in the last 20 years or so? Nothing! they have losers who circle jerk them and call themselves a fan base.

Pre-crime, without tooting my own horn too much, is probably the most brilliant thing anyone has ever come up with and yet, I’m supposed to pretend actors and the ilk are on this level? Lmfao! You pretend for a living and I get shit done for the sake of it. We are not the same.

People will say I’m jealous. Weird for a dude who never even tried his hand at any of it and rejected a majority of things I could have done in the field.

People will say I’m arrogant. Technically true, but merited. I’ve bested more people than most celebrities have fans for my Google rank.

People will say I’m petty and that’s your problem.

All things a narcissistic asshole would say. That’s you projecting on me.

What if I told you that pretending the audience matters is neither narcissistic nor selfless. What if I told you, that no matter how well an act of entertainment goes, I always feel dejected after. What’s more narcissistic? Continuing down that path or shunning it? my answer is continuing down that path is more NPD. Why? Because I’m causing myself friction internally. It doesn’t jibe with who I’m am in my youth and who I am as an adult.

Some might say I’m selfish, people need humor. Doesn’t the world need more doctors, police, firefighters, veterinary technicians though? Is it selfish that at 39 years old, I’ve spent the last 20 years of my life educating the world? Have I done light stuff like reviews, sure, but I’ve done some interesting and thoughtful pieces as well.

Why do I phrase such so arrogantly? For a reason, because not only is that entire statement true, not a single bit of it is NPD. It doesn’t met the criteria for it. Delusion? No, we’re past that stage as my system seems to be relevant. Special treatment seeking? No, because the algorithm I invented makes me meet the criteria for a deity. What’s that criteria? Omnipresent, omnipotent and Omniceinant. why is none of this NPD? Because it doesn’t meet the criteria of a personal plight internally and if it can be proven then my rhetoric is irrelevant.

Not writing for instance gives me more of a personal plight. Would that make me NPD? Absolutely! Ironic that not writing, something inherently not necessary would drive me batshit to not do. Yet the egregiously arrogant statement doesn’t.

Here’s a mild NPD test that you can use to see if your one. Which of these statements is true?

1.) I’m a good person if I stop someone from being a celebrity.

2.) I’m a bad person for not stopping someone from becoming famous?

Answer yes to one and you’re NPD. Why? What right did you have to Garudian another persons life? The answer is none. You had intersectionality in the negative way.

Walk by a narc and not give them preferential treatment, they will try to negatively impact your life. Why? Because they took it personally. Oh nooo! That makes me a narc according to internet videos. Why? Because of a phrase over context is more important to the butt hurt brigade than reason.

Not a single one of those last statements were flattering to me, yet, fuck you! Uh oh, I lacked empathy for the reader. Were you really hurt by that though? No? Didn’t think so. Yet I’m a narc for that too!

Pretty much every mental illness in the DSM is just NPD by different names. Nightmare disorder? That’s NPD in sleep. Why? Because it causes you the disorder. Social anxiety? That’s NPD over neurotic tendencies.

As I’ve pointed out in a video from my 20s about Autism “provided a doctor clears it, it’s ok to be an asshole.”-Kage

Damn it, there I go again, being a narc because I quoted my brilliance and was unsympathetic to a fictional desiese, that I don’t believe is caused by weird nutrition, I don’t believe it exists either.

It’s not the fact, that gaslighting, doesn’t exist. Only weak minded bafoons fall for that. It’s not flying monkeys bs or anything the internet has lead legions of idiots to accept and cause NPD witch hunts. It’s a lot more than videos let on.

Shit, even The Bible got it right by naming pride as a sin, because when it’s counter productive, like not taking personal responsibility for yourself , it’s NPD type of shit.

As a recap, words are irrelevant unless they can or cannot be proven. The narc needs to basically ruin their lives for it to even be NPD. Only they know for sure. Someone telling you you’re wrong isn’t gaslighting, thinking your friends are special to you isn’t narcissistic, just because a rando online or at the store takes issue with it. Applying to any job doesn’t make you NPD because some places only have a Walmart to work, get the gig and shut up and help yourself and other loved ones.

Lastly, fuck these retarded internet gurus that tell you it’s in phrases or other bullshit. They should all be de-monetized and no longer allowed to practice. They too busy using you as their flying monkeys to witch hunt people and be relevant like most wannabes, when the below average brigade that is the general public, don’t have the credibility or credentials to even type you.

Until next time, stay metal 🤘

Writing

Why I’m in favor of political violence in a post Charlie Kirk world.

Leave a comment

There is a huge difference between civil unrest and political violence. Martin Luther King Jr’s assassination wasn’t political violence, it was civil unrest. Abe Lincoln’s death wasn’t political violence, it was civil unrest. I know civil unrest sounds like I’m down playing the deaths, however, historically political violence has been known as war. While war should be scarce, it’s historically done us good. Revolutionary war, the civil war, world war 2. Without political violence we would all be goose stepping and speaking German.

However trite civil unrest sounds, it’s vastly downright from war. Civil unrest is when you get a tough climate and tensions rise within. Sometimes the catalyst for war itself, however, that’s isn’t always true.

Charlie was a martyr for Christian values or conservatism, he was assassinated for ego and valuation. Charlie clearly wasn’t a Hitler in training and attempting a political overthrow, he was a father and a husband that wanted the best for his children.

However, he is a martyr for stupidity. Ivory tower dumb fucks we call millennial, with 80s yuppie entitlement issues that seem to think they in the midst of a war, like it’s the 1960s. To compare the two would be an egregiously ignorant thing. Blacks were oppressed in the 60s, along with other minorities. There isn’t any way to hide it. What do we have now but micro disagreement. I’ve said this in my 20s and I’ll repeat it in my 40s, you can’t compare civil rights to the gay marriage movement. Sammy Davis jr couldn’t hide his skin, and while I disagree with the idea that gays should have to be closeted, such was far from real repression. Real repression is when you’re a homosexual college student and you get dragged by the back of a truck for no reason like Matthew Shepherd.

Trans “rights” is not a real issue , they’re just trading one set of rights for another.

Gay marriage isn’t a real issue , because love is more important than people giving a fuck about you.

Blacks and other minorities have been integrated into society for 60 something years, they’re not repressed.

The palatines aren’t repressed, you’re anti Semitic and need to grow up.

What we do have a real issue with is the looming threat of a third world war among other real issues going

The only thing Charlie’s death did, was reveal a bigger overall narrative of mental health issues among the millennial cohort than ever before.

Let’s start focusing on real issues again. As a line from one of my favorite scenes says

“we can’t be consumed with our petty differences anymore.” -President Witmore Independence Day

My condolences to Charlie’s family, friends and fans.

Stay metal 🤘

Non-fiction, Pre-Crime, Uncategorized

Pre-Crime:The Future is Now

Leave a comment

Copyright © 2018 by Karl R Reed Jr, aka Xavier Kage

All rights reserved. This book or any portion thereof
may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever
without the express written permission of the publisher
except for the use of brief quotations in a book review.

Printed in the United States of America

First Printing, 2018

Bestinyourgirl.com

Kage, Xavier (1986- )

Introduction
What you hold in your hands is a hypothesis of over a decades worth of research, putting together the big picture and finding the clues that lead to the ability to predict criminality before it has even happened, better than anything in the past has. It has been tried before, but never has it come to fruition quit like I hope it will here. The travel to this destination has been a long and arduous one, paved with long hours analyzing data, drinking myself to the point of almost dying, thrice. Many nights of my friend crying and sobbing over negative things that have happened to her from an abuser, her former “lover”. Watching the ramifications of those actions from her teenage years impact her being as a twenty something adult and even banging my head on my parents kitchen table, crawling under it, in an attempt to console my best friend from fits of PTSD meltdowns. My twenties was far better than my own youth, in a lot of ways, but still no spring break in Cancun or any partying, outside of drinking by myself or with my best friend. Besides a best friend, I’ve also dealt with issues that my mom and sister have gone through within their lives from similar events and I don’t want to see others go down this same dark path. It would be fitting that I should possibly be the one to end pedophilia, among other things that plague our world, but when it comes down to it, Pre-crime is the second best thing to happen to criminals, short of a holocaust!

One

Crime can easily be defined as anything that is currently against the law. Quite obvious and easy, that doesn’t really say much. Humanity, regardless of era, is willing to outlaw acts for which it thinks it abhorrent or horrible, sometimes with logic, but more often without, such as smoking marijuana, for instance. What does nature think of law? It doesn’t, it does not care for it at all. Technically, there is no such thing as crime from a nature standpoint. It’s a societal construct, as much as I hate delving into postmodernism, it is true! Think about our ancestral environment, there was no cops to stop crime, there were no politicians to create law, no one to stop anyone. All you had was yourself, someone who loved you, or at the very least, didn’t entirely hate you. Why is that? Society didn’t really exist, there were only tribes and most humans are prone to only being able to deal with 100-250 people at a time. During the entire span of humanity, people have committed some of the worst things imaginable to one another. Tribes killed other tribes, rape was kosher, and pedophilia wasn’t as frowned upon, with the exception of the parents, if even, given that children were more often married by 12 in our ancestral environment, due to short life expectancy. The Wild West also allowed for child prostitutes. Human decency didn’t really exist in any context, in any epoch. Nearly everything was allowed for and most people engaged in it.
Greece is an excellent example of allowance in regards to sexuality, allowing for modified forms of pedophilia. Homosexuality, of both varieties, were also considered ok.

As the years rolled on and civilizations came and went, so too did the idea of crime itself. Each civilization had its own ideas of what was and wasn’t allowable. Paganism wasn’t frowned upon is ancient cultures, but you would have been burned at the stake in 1600’s Salem, Massachusetts. Humans have never been the greatest species to walk the planet, but it sure is the most apt to reflect upon our experiences better than any other ones; at least to our knowledge.

This is where the idea for pre-crime comes into view. It knows nature does not care about humans in any way, shape or form, whatsoever and whatever our little malignant heart desires is basically cool. Since crime doesn’t exist, by nature’s viewpoint, there is only human nature. If there is only human nature, it’s predicable. If it’s predicable, it can be thwarted long before a criminal has the chance to hurt an innocent human being.
There are already ways of “predicating” crime, but it’s only deals with some aspects of human nature. It doesn’t predict the victim. My hypothesis does, making pre-crime true to its word and you don’t have to put as much work into it as I have had to, as I’ve already done the heavy work for you.

So, allow me to create a list of crimes that we will be looking to predict. At present, it works best with blue collar crime, but will ultimately still predict white collar crime with a few tweaks.

1. Rape, Including, but not limited to, pedophilia.
2. Murder, including, mass, serial and “random”.
3. Theft of all kinds.
4. Drug dealers and their victims.

These are the most important blue collar crimes that are currently committed and the only ones that really plague society. While I could use the algorithm to predict children spray-painting the ground or a stoner smoking weed, we’re not concerned with these, as while the former is uncouth and the latter is a freedom, there is no long term consequences for these actions.

Two
While often overlooked for being the equal of astrology, the Myers-Briggs or from here on out the MBTI, is actually a very powerful tool! It allows us to see how people engage the real world. Contrary to popular belief, it’s really couldn’t care less if all ENTP types are devil’s advocate or if all INTJ types are inflexible. All it cares about is the system and that system is used to navigate the murky waters of the world. I believe, given the ability to test this, it might even be genetic and the next chapter will deal with how to test it to see if it, indeed, is.

Here is all you’re going to have to know in order to start analyzing the hypothesis and see this exist.

There are two types of people, Extroverts and Introverts. Whatever you think you know about the terms, forget it. It’s really an energy exchange. Extroverts usually gain energy fromsocial exchanges and introverts lose energy. We can back up this up with Richard Dawkin’s The Selfish Gene (1976) in regard to cost/benefit analysis. Extroverts gain energy from socializing, so it is beneficial. Conversely, for the introvert, socializing can be masochism. Both are observable in the outside world and the inverse can be true of the Extrovert and Introvert as well, but other factors cause the inverse. Most will adhere to the norm.

I find and I hate to be anecdotal here, that intuition and sensing can be quite literal. In other words, a seemingly innocuous mistake, may be the system alerting the user to danger! It’s like looking at someone and calling them a serial killer. Imagine being right? How do you know? Looks can be deceiving, but it’s not as absurd as it seems as I’m sure we as a species has evolved to utilize such to protect ourselves and our kin, in the same way we have evolved other traits. Rational types, as they are referred to in the theory, would be wise to disregard such, but in doing so, they could be in peril. Irrational types, also the MBTI’s technical word, are prone to listening to it. Think a detective in a movie with no more than a hunch.

Humans as a species have evolved to gossip and accept such, sometimes without reservation or vetting, from people we trust. Sometimes, they even do it to the point of ignoring evidence to the contrary. These types are irrationals! Now those are 4 unique things regarding the system to look for. In regards to Perception vs Judging, while it seems difficult and we can test their adaptive behavior, it can be even more observable than we think. J’s tend to have a structure when engaging the world. Let me look at the ENTJ for instance. Let’s say you’re in a conversation with them and they express something, say just “I hate rap.” If they’re a Judging type, they may very well then reconsider the thought, but it would be structured, say holding their chin and rethinking it, but quite involuntary, like snapping your head towards a topless woman or muscular hunk! A Perspective would be less structured and may just redact something, say, because it makes them seem closed minded or salty. It’s quite easy to trigger off once you’ve understood how to look for it and while it seems arbitrary, it will seem genuine in the moment.

The last observable trait for seeing the MBTI in the real world is some of these traits that are imbued from the personality type that isn’t something stupid like enjoying a martini in the middle of summer or liking rap, those actually come from a different aspect of our nature altogether. Sensing types for instance are concreate and literal, seeing is believing and this why some don’t always understand theory, and while their literalness can sometimes be associated with autism, just one trait doesn’t make them autistic, which is why we must look to ensure that it isn’t their system first. Intuition as well, since it seems to imbue upon the person a so called “third eye”.

All of these can easily be discerned through observation and those are the most important. The hypothesis doesn’t care if you’re an Aries with a bad moon rising nor does the MBTI.

In the next chapter, we will be dealing with major histocompatibility Complex.

Three
Major histocompatibility Complex from here on out this will be called MHC for short. The MHC is like a unique blueprint in all of us, which allows woman to see a man’s suitability for reproductive purposes. This can be done in one of two ways, through kissing or through olfactory glands. While the idea of human beings and phenomes have been “controversial”, the idea has merit to it. The idea goes that it’s a check and balance
system to impede pseudo and real incest between people too close on this spectrum to ensure diversity in gene reproduction and healthier progeny.Everyone has a MHC and it is unique to everyone. Like a thumbprint, no two people are alike. Even twins do not have the same MHC.This seems to be one of the biggest driving factors between not just sexuality, as even gay humans use this, but friendships between the opposite sexes as well. The dreaded “friendzone” that millennial men complain about, might in part, be caused by the MHC complex.

The idea works like this, birth control does alter a woman’s biology. It tricks the body into thinking it is pregnant, the hypothesis in regards to pregnancy is when a woman is pregnant, she is prone towards being around family for protection, since the suitor would have been long gone, had they not pair bonded and raring a child is no easy task. The female would need to stay near men who could help in raring a child, which would be male siblings and her own dad, in order to protect the progeny and their genetics. This, it should be noted, is different from “dad” types as they are called, since there would be good reason for helping to rare future progeny as
she is older and mature enough to make these decision, since nature favors the female choice in reproductive mates.

This would also alter her sex drive, causing her to reject different MHC and instead seek “Dad” types to assist in child rearing. If a woman is on Birth control, this will cause her to reject the right suitors and instead go towards men with similar MHC, ergo, in one way causing this “friendzone.” Without birth control, she will seek the right suitors for her. The other two possibilities for “friendzones” exist in the man not picking up on female signals and thus costing himself and downright entitlement towards sexual relations with the opposite sex in general. This causes incels. I.E. not being the right man to breed with and getting bitter over this.

These things are extremely important to note, because they relate to criminality and how nature “views” it, as opposed to most humans!
Sex and crime go hand in hand as I will show in the next chapter, since pre-crime was born out of understanding pedophiles and how this equates to other “criminal” behavior, we will start to put this all into perspective.

Four
What is a pedophile? Well, the technical definition of a pedophile is one with a preoccupation with prepubescent children. A hebephiliac is one with an emphasis on middle school children and Ephebophila is someone with a sexual inclination towards 15 to 19 years of age.

It is important to note, none of these are sexualities, as age is not a sexual orientation, and it’s a preference. Preferences are developed, sexual orientations are static. I have always liked older woman, but my desire is not sexuality, as there is no “Milfsexual” orientation, nor should there be, because it is preference! So, a pedophile who likes young girls, is a straight pedophile with a preference for prepubescent girls, just as I am an adult man with a preference for middle age woman, mostly. This is no different from a woman preferring muscular men or a mustache, the preference isn’t exhibited by all and may even change with time.

Pedophilia doesn’t even meet the criteria for sexuality anyways, as sexuality doesn’t involve strong, hard to overcome urges that result in rape or other nefarious activity! Pedophilia, instead, is a form of cuckoldry, though. My logic for this is as follows. Woman decide which male is best suited to pass on their genetics through reproducing with the female. As in the last chapter, the female who is pregnant would stay close to male relatives in order to gain help in the form of child rearing. If the girl is too young to make such a decision for themselves or being so young, force could be used to get the girl to make such a decision, the father would be the one to bare reproductive cost for another man’s child in much the same way as if he had to bear the cost of his own wife being impregnated by another man. This would be horrible for him and why, I think, some conservatives are fine with abortion due to rape or cases of incest. When it comes to a man’s young boy, sometimes the opposite seems to be the case. This is sometimes seen as a double standard, but it really isn’t, since a woman would have picked the man’s adolescent son for intercourse, showing casing to him, successful reproduction had indeed happened for him, giving him feelings of elation and pride, instead of what idiots refer to as “toxic masculinity.”

Albeit, rape, at one point was most likely a strategy used in the ancestral environment, which men with poor genetic material, would of engaged in, in an attempt to sire progeny. While I am on the subject, pedophilia might occasionally be the same, as there is such a thing as “surrogate” pedophiles, but the results for finding them would be the same, since it would be steeped in
preference for certain types of woman, but rather than be a crime of desire, it’s an act of sexual poverty and a crime of opportunity, since most these people would rather fuck an adult than a child.

In fact, the old argument of “LGBT marriage will equate to pedos” is absolute BULLSHIT! It was actually oversights of old, such as allowing girls as young as 11 to marry in the 1800’s and before that allowed for LGBT marriage, not vice versa and we have since become more Enlighted to not allow for child sexual acts of any types to be performed, albeit 16 is legal in most states. Homosexual sex acts are 100% normal.

With that out of the way, we turn to the aspect of how this fits in with the last chapter! While not a sexuality, it acts like one because of the sexuality of the pedophile. This allows for us to predict with the utmost accuracy, the exact victims a pedophile will seek. This also allows for us to predict the exact victim’s murders and other criminals as well. In effect, predicting crime before it happens.

Alright, so here is how everything breaks down in terms of human tribalization. First, when you’re younger, you’re usually attracted to that which is akin. This is mostly likely to protect a child from straying away. The skin to skin contact forms a parental bond as protection. The MBTI personalities will be similar on a spectrum as well. Here is some instance from my own youthfor instance, two big influences on me as a writer. Both of which, in the MBTI are most likely Intuitive types. Both come off as a J types. One comes off more introverted and the other comes off more extrovert. One was a systems analyst. Normally a spectrum of the INTJ, albeit it, plenty of P types have exhibited such. I too am a system analyst and intuitive. The other isn’t, as far as I know, a system analyst, but it is all in the same spectrum of J’s and P’s. A lot of one of the authors books involved intuition as a major trope. This isn’t to liken myself to famous celebrities, but rather showcase that I liked a lot of things within my own spectrum. Involving other things I enjoyed, like Professional wrestling, the personality types have been similar as well. You’re not guaranteed to be 100% akin to your favorite celebrity, but closer to home, your friends are.

While not everything is 100% exact, I have liked the odd sensing type, but it is extremely rare instance.Your friends, opposite and similar sex, will most likely share similar genetics to you. For instance, a few of my friends and I share the MCR-1 gene, which is responsible for red hair and our I.Q.’s are in the same spectrum, among a slew of other genetics. For the sake of not self-aggrandizing myself, since the actual number is unimportant to the hypothesis, I will omit it. While they don’t think I.Q. is genetic, it still very real and people are likely to gravitate towards those people and form tribes with them.

I came to this conclusion accidentally. Apparently too inept to work a McJob in the town of Biddeford, Maine. I took it upon myself to criticize my performance as I am prone to doing and ensuring I improved in order to be hirable anywhere, including better jobs later on. Obviously, like most of my readers, all four to six of you, I wanted to be successful. As I analyzed the system, I noticed the patterns on hirable people. All of them were within the spectrum of MBTI personality type, all had similar genetics, I.Q. and backgrounds. All exhibited a lack of consciousness and most were inclined towards being musically absorb. It should be noted that Maine in general ranks low in contentiousness, while Florida is ranked one of the highest for it. It should also be noted that 90% of major companies use the MBTI during their hiring process. It should also be noted, the army use a similar test to sort people out. So, life is basically a caste system that is exhibited in both the real world and in the business world. Some people have better genetics than others and a more in demand, we have always known this in part, as good looks grant great privilege.

While some people reject the notion of alpha and beta men, the evidence posits otherwise. Yes, humans form hierarchy, but that is built on similar principles.
So, jobs breakdown as follows, each one corresponds to the MBTI and with enough knowledge, you can figure out what types they are looking for. One instance, a company that shan’t be named, discriminates against Intuitive types, looking only for sensors. The test you take to get the job, ask if you use intuition and then rejects you if you say yes, among other pro sensing questions. I was rejected because I wasn’t a sensor.

Even when they don’t ask on online test, I have taken plenty that have rejected me, where the entire company has been nothing but sensing types. In fact, I’ve been unemployable for pretty much 14 years, because I live in a town of 96% white sensing types. This isn’t to be poor me, this is how I have uncovered the human tribal system, which in turn, then deals with criminality.

Now, in those 14 years, I have managed to walk into manager jobs a decent number of times, which perplexed me. Who the hell walks into manager? It’s running a company, especially in a town full of sensing types, mostly P types, whom normally show preference for experience.
Albeit my aunt did it in my hometown, but me being a teenager, I assumed and erroneously, it must be a “who you know” type of situation.
I have done everything under the sun that has ever gotten a person a job and none of it has worked, because I am unable to peg off solipsism, which, normally turns out to be correct in their assumptions that we’re in fact, not alike.
It was anything but luck and I have been able to replicate these finding over and over, time and time again.

Now, in regards to hierarchy, it seems to have some component with masculinity. In each tribe, regardless of which of the 16 personality types they have, the coordinator or the “alpha” will always be masculine. As we go down the clock, so to speak, the more effeminate the male will become. “Beta” often possess almost as much masculinity as the “Alpha” themselves, they’re just not as good as coordinating the tribe and this can change with time. This results in everyone being an integral part of the team and is very important to every business. It should be noted that, with modern transgender studies, like those of Harvard in 2012 or 13, that a person’s masculine/feminine make up are decided entirely in the womb, by testosterone and estrogen levels in the natal environment.
It should be noted, that besides the personality types, there is two types of people in the world. Independent people and team workers. Others can work between them. These independent people will only be employable at jobs that need people who are “self-starting, go getters” who do not need to be coordinated. Freelancers, contractors, pro-wrestlers, business owners, ect. These types are often referred to as sigma.

So, now that we have that all out of the way, it important to note, all these aspect as quantifiable. Also, everyone’s experiences is in part, right. People attract that which is similar and occasion that which is opposite, because that is what we need to get along in the work force. The opposite almost always comes into play when a person is at the height of maturity and while it seems anecdotal, it is 100% provable.

This too, is how crime plays out. Criminals will almost always share, not just personality type, but genetic components as well and this is how pedophiles pick their victims. It’s not always a constant act, but the more hits on these multiple spectrums, the higher the chance the person is going to be choose, so let’s make a list of how my algorithm would work in finding the potential victim of a known pedophile with 100% accuracy.
List
1. MBTI type.
2. Genetic similarity
3. Graduation of masculinity/femininity.
4. I.Q. levels
5. Backgrounds
6. Sexuality
7. Looks on the golden ratio
These seven keys, with potential for uncovering more, are how human beings come together and form a tribe. Serial Killers, regardless of habitual nature, will almost always choose the exact personality type. So let us give another example of how this would look.

Serial Killer Guy, is a guy who has been spurn by a lover. She’s blonde, 5’4, rosebud lips and an ass that goes for days. As we already know, he will continue to seek 5’4 blondes with similar features to the woman that hurt him. How many 5’4 tall blondes can there be in any given city? Innumerable, I’m sure. Which is why these additional steps make a more specific algorithm for knowing which he is likely to kill. So our killer is a ISTJ who was spurned by a ISTP, both are roughly 120 in IQ, straight, employable at jobs that need a manager, but neither of which are managers, each one has the genes for blue eyes, expressed in his would be lover but dormant in him.
By knowing this information before hand, we can, to a T, realize who his victims are going to be. If we factor in things such as the lack of free will humans possess, we can even figure out where they will strike and I believe, when they will strike, due to these types of offenders always doing at the height of their stress, when they need to relive their impulse or the stress of daily life.

Five
It should be noted that pre-crime is not perfect, and I am not suggesting arresting people for thought-crime. With the right amount of research, we can possible severely reduce crime though and even get to it before it happens. Right now I am unable to predict infant sexual attacks as more research is needed, but I have enough evidence, non-anecdotal, to showcase there is merit to the hypothesis and plan to start rolling out the algorithm to police stations when it is peer reviewed and firmly science. Also, it can be used in reverse to predict the past with absolute accuracy. I never went to school with a baby
boomer for instance, but I could predict their entire sexual history with just those six keys as if I had been there. While I would like to delve extensively into the genetics of criminals and their victims, I may not get that opportunity for all, but that’s ok, as genetics that are mostly visible, without having to get thousands of people into MRI machines and constantly vetting their genetics as it works fine with just the quantifiable genetics, thanks to the likes of Darwin and Johann Gregor Mendal and that is all that would be needed to start breaking out pre-crime as actual fact and really preemptively saving lives in the process. One last thing, because such may trigger people, say, in Facebook science groups, that race plays no factor in who is and isn’t a criminal. Nor does it mean a white person and a black person would never be matched. Skin color is merely an expression of pigmentation and either way, blacks, white, Asians and more will share similar genetics. It’s not like Black People are Lions attempting to mate with a white puppy. No one is free from any of the keys of human tribalism and diversity isn’t as diverse as it seems when you look at the structure of humanity anyways. A black and white couple will be, in a lot of ways as similar as a black and an Asian. This was completed in an all-white town, but has been observed in many other cities, with a lot of diversity and it always plays out the same way.

Ultimately, though I could make a lot of money off of selling this algorithm once it is 100% legitimate science, that isn’t my goal, even with sacrificing my twenties in order to complete it. It comes down to family and friends. Anyone who has ever loved a victim knows how hard dealing with the issues caused by being hurt by pedophiles or other criminals. I’ve spent the better part of my 32 years on this planet dealing with the outfall of such atrocious acts, having a mother and sister who have been assaulted and a best friend, whom, thanks to her pedophile abuser, messed her up real bad and caused me to bump my head, whilst drunk, on my parents kitchen table. I may have been unemployable for nearly 2 decades, but boy, did I recover Steller! It is because of this that I wish to help distribute and further research more and contribute it to as many law enforcement offices as humanly possible with due time, in hopes crime is extinguished, once and for all!